Why I Look Forward to Hearing
Donald Trump Despite Disagreeing with Almost All of His Views and Detesting
Many of Them
At the outset, I should recognize that Trump’s supporters want to watch
him because they believe that the substance of what he is advocating is
right. While I don’t agree with
him on the majority of issues, everyone is, of course, entitled to his or her
opinion.
What I am addressing here is why I -- someone who disagrees with most
of Trump’s positions and the way he presents them, in many cases strongly --
will almost always stop and watch Trump when I hear he is about to appear on
television.
There are several reasons.
One is I find myself in something of a state of “wonderment:” what zany idea will he come up with
next? It’s a form of
entertainment.
Second, I have to admit I take a certain “smug sense of satisfaction”
from hearing him, believing that my views are much more rational and humane
than his.
Third, and most dangerous, I gravitate to watching him because as
wrong-headed as I find many of his views, there are some of his qualities that I admire. What do I refer to? His genuineness. His candor. His utter authenticity. I’ve often said that I like to hear it said of someone that
“what you see is what you get.”
One thing that is true about Trump: “what you see is what you get.” And we had better pay attention to that, the substance of
what he is saying. Because
if we don’t like or agree with “what we see,” or “hear,” and in many respects
we shouldn’t, we dare not elect this man.
I don’t know if the reasons I’ve given here are shared by others. But there is a danger in them. One is that they explain why Trump is
getting so much free air -time. Media treasure high ratings.
On George Stephanopoulos’ “This Week” program on Sunday, he had live
interviews with Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. The one for Trump was not only 4-5
times longer than the other two, but the nature of the interview was
different. Trump controlled it
totally. Now, George
Stephanopoulos is an outstanding interviewer, one of the very best. But Trump just ran over him. George found it virtually impossible to
follow up on Trump’s avoidance of tough questions. Trump just carried on with his own message, uninterruptable.
Trump’s message is a siren’s song, just as autocratic, super confident
leaders have been in the past.
I’ve never seen anyone in this country who so controls an interview like
Trump does. So audacious. We have heard about people who came
close. Father Coughlin. Huey Long perhaps. Decades ago.
I’m confident that in the end the Republican Party will not nominate
Donald Trump. I believe his
positions and temperament will come to be seen for what they are: out of line with our nation’s values,
intemperate, unbalanced, immature, even if some are rooted in genuine,
legitimate concerns that people have about our nation and their personal lives. But we better be careful. There is no predicting what a Trump
presidency would be, and that is the “best case.” The “worst case” is that Trump’s presidency would be
exactly what he says it would be. Building
walls, insisting that Mexico pay for them; stopping all Muslims from entering
the country, thereby alienating the Muslim allies whom we need with us to
combat terrorism; telling Apple to stop making computers in China. Of course, none of these things would
happen. But the Government would
be in chaos as he tried to make them happen. And we would be the laughing stock
of the world.
Having said all this, I’m torn on this question of whether I – and
people who feel as I do -- should keep watching Trump. On the one hand, I say “no.” We are giving him credit beyond his due
and in doing so he gets more free air time. On the other hand, I say -- and this is my final position –
“yes,” let’s keep watching. But in
doing so, let’s have the media start to vigorously challenge the truth of what
he is saying and the rightness of what he is saying. Let’s stop giving him a free ride. Let’s force the truth to emerge.
You are so right on every point! It's unbelievable how he continues to run over these seasoned professionals in interviews. So frustrating to watch, but I can't stop either!
ReplyDeleteI worked for P&G for 37 years and through your entire tenure as CEO. I loved your philosophy then and I like your thinking expressed here in your blog. I have a blog also that I thought you might like to peruse. Here's a link to a quickie on Trump, but you might enjoy some of my other posts. If you do, please let me know.
ReplyDeletehttp://kevincanfield.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-trump-sandwich.html